# \#xbee-pro-hp-end

**URL:** https://forums.digi.com/tag/xbee-pro-hp-end/2173.md

[Latest](https://forums.digi.com/latest.md) · [Categories](https://forums.digi.com/categories.md) · [Tags](https://forums.digi.com/tags.md)

---

## [XBP09-DPSIT-156 vs XBP9B-DPST-001throughput](https://forums.digi.com/t/xbp09-dpsit-156-vs-xbp9b-dpst-001throughput/14922)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@msna](https://forums.digi.com/u/msna)\
**Replies:** 6\
**Last updated:** [June 12, 2015, 11:06am UTC](https://forums.digi.com/t/xbp09-dpsit-156-vs-xbp9b-dpst-001throughput/14922 "2015-06-12T11:06:34Z")

</div>

Hi, I have a design based on the XBEE-900-Pro (XBP09-DPSIT-156). I am trying to migrate to the new 900 HP series(XBP9B-DPST-001). In my m2m application the radios are configured as none-router end nodes at both ends. …