XBee3, Python: what is the difference between device.discovery of remote device vs instantiating a remote device object?

XBee & XBee Gateway XBee - Zigbee
, , ,
1

I have an XBee3 ZigBee network here.

I’m using the Python built in library:
https://xbplib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user_doc/communicating_with_xbee_devices.html

In the relative beginning of my program I of course establish connection with all the reouter devices in my network of many routers and a coordinator. I am wondering what the difference is between instantiating a remote xbee device object like so:

Instantiate a remote XBee device object.

remote_device = RemoteXBeeDevice(device, XBee64BitAddress.from_hex_string(“0013A20040XXXXXX”))

and discovering a remote xbee device via it’s Node Identifier (NI) like so:

Discover the remote device whose node ID is ‘SOME NODE ID’.

remote = xnet.discover_device(“SOME NODE ID”)

For the duration of my project I’ve been just discovering the remote devices in the network using the latter NI string identifier. However, now I have new design requirements and so I would like to discover the device by it’s MAC address. So, fundamentally I would like a better understanding of the two above things: instantiating via MAC vs discovering via NI.

if I instantiate, does that inherently discover the device behind the scenes? or would I have to discover the device separately…?

2

What is this code to run on? Are you trying to use the Micro Python interface on the XBee 3 or is this code to run on an external processor?

1 Like
3

this will run on the pc python

4

The NI does a discovery to a known ASCII value and resolves the 64 bit address off of that ASCII value for you. It is meant to be a user friendly way of discovering and setting a destination address.

5

ok cool. and so the instantiation of a router device via specifying its MAC address:

Instantiate a remote XBee device object.

remote_device = RemoteXBeeDevice(device, XBee64BitAddress.from_hex_string(“0013A20040XXXXXX”))

“discovers” or establishes an official network connection… as does the NI discover… both, as standalone uses, establishes / discovers the network connection “equally”. how do I say, if I use either one, poof connection established right? lol

6

like in my code here:

remote_2 = RemoteXBeeDevice(local_device, XBee64BitAddress.from_hex_string(jn_device_mac))
print('remote_2 before NI set: ', remote_2)
remote_2.set_node_id(‘TOWER_2’)
print('remote_2 after NI set: ', remote_2)
tower_2 = xnet.discover_device(“TOWER_2”)

the last line of xnet.discover_device(NI) would be redundant because I established connection via the MAC in the first line and then just gave it a new NI. so, connection established and using the discover via NI would be redundant?

7

That is correct.