What’s broken with the latest Connect ME 9210 -C modules (DC-ME-Y402-C
)? I used the default factory ftp server application to load our image.bin. The file was accepted and appears to have been programmed into flash. But the module appears to hang instead of running our app. When I power cycle the programmed device I see the same LED pattern as a working device, but no ethernet or serial comm (at least at our baud rate–I should scope the line just to be sure).
I tried grounding pins 18 and 20 at boot; that put the module into the bootp/tftp recovery mode. This would suggest that our image.bin was accepted and that the Digi bootloader is jumping to our app, which then hangs. Right?
We just received the order of 150 that was on backorder with Mouser for 14 months! In our excitement to finally have some parts, we expedited them to our CM and had them solder the modules into our product, drove up late Friday to pick 'em up, and then learned Saturday morning that the modules won’t run our application! We’ve used probably 1k of these devices with this image.bin over the last 12 years and I’ve never seen anything like this before.
I used our automated script to load the first image. When it failed I thought “hmm, weird”. Tried a second with the same result–that’s really weird. I turned off the script and drove ftp by hand for third module, and when it failed I knew we had a big problem.
Here’s a cut-n-paste of my FTP session:
ftp 192.168.0.142
Connected to 192.168.0.142.
220 NET+OS 7.6.1.8 FTP server ready.
Name (192.168.0.142:pi): root
331 User root OK, send password.
Password:
230 Password OK.
Remote system type is NET+ARM.
ftp> bin
200 Type set to I.
ftp> put image.bin
local: image.bin remote: image.bin
200 PORT command Ok.
150 About to open data connection.
226 Transfer complete
756248 bytes sent in 0.40 secs (1.7835 MB/s)
ftp> quit
221 Goodbye.
If I FTP into the new module running the factory application, I see this:
Welcome NET+OS 7.6.1.8 Command Line Interface
#> version
NET+OS Version 7.6.1.8
Copyright (c) 1997-2011, 2013 Digi International, Inc.
PLATFORM: connectme9210 (Built: Mar 02 2021 10:00:46)
APPLICATION: Ram-based FTP Server Application (PN: 82001946) (Built Mar 2 2021 10:03:49)
on LOG-CMS-LOAN02
with GCC 4.2 (4.2.0 Microcross GNU X-Tools™)
flash info
0: 8K 1: 8K 2: 8K 3: 8K
4: 8K 5: 8K 6: 8K 7: 8K
8: 64K 9: 64K 10: 64K 11: 64K
12: 64K 13: 64K 14: 64K 15: 64K
16: 64K 17: 64K 18: 64K 19: 64K
20: 64K 21: 64K 22: 64K 23: 64K
24: 64K 25: 64K 26: 64K 27: 64K
28: 64K 29: 64K 30: 64K 31: 64K
32: 64K 33: 64K 34: 64K 35: 64K
36: 64K 37: 64K 38: 64K 39: 64K
40: 64K 41: 64K 42: 64K 43: 64K
44: 64K 45: 64K 46: 64K 47: 64K
48: 64K 49: 64K 50: 64K 51: 64K
52: 64K 53: 64K 54: 64K 55: 64K
56: 64K 57: 64K 58: 64K 59: 64K
60: 64K 61: 64K 62: 64K 63: 64K
64: 64K 65: 64K 66: 64K 67: 64K
68: 64K 69: 64K 70: 64K
If I reload our image.bin using the bootp/tftp recovery method, I see this:
Starting TFTP recovery…
Writing to Flash…
Resetting…
What I have: a known good image.bin file that we’ve used for 1k installations over the last 10+ years, 147 new and presumed defective 9210 modules with the factory application soldered to our product, 3 new defective 9210 modules with our application, a NET-OS 7.5 CD, dev board, old 9210 Wifi+jtag module, and a handful of known good 9210 modules with our application.
What I don’t have: an old known good 9210 with factory application to compare telnet/ftp server versions, a new defective 9210 jtag module, source for our application (we license it from another company).
Is it possible these new modules left the factory with a buggy bootloader that’s not fully init’ing the hardware, and that’s the cause of these hangs? Surely there’s not a hardware incompatibility, right?
We really need a solution that doesn’t involve spending $3k unsoldering and resoldering these modules. And of course the 9210 have been impossible to get for over a year, so it’s not like I can just order more.
thanks for any help/advice/suggestions!